Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mint Corp V.MIT

Alternate Symbol(s):  MITJF

The Mint Corporation, through its subsidiaries, is a globally certified payments company. The Company is focused on offering financial services to the unbanked salaried worker in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The Company provides employers with payroll cards for their unbanked employees. It offers employers scalable, flexible and payroll card management solutions through its globally certified payments platform. It also focuses on facilitating payroll disbursement for unbanked workers, employees not qualified for traditional bank accounts. Its UAE operations comprise five entities, including Mint Middle East LLC (MME), Mint Electronic Payment Services Ltd (MEPS), Mint Capital LLC (MCO), Mint Gateway for Electronic Payment Services (MGEPS) and Hafed Holding (Hafed). MME is a payroll card services provider facilitating an automated and secure payroll system to employers in the UAE. Its UAE operations payroll cards and mobile app are branded under the Hafed name.


TSXV:MIT - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by panhandlephillipson Apr 19, 2013 10:08am
142 Views
Post# 21274379

RE: RE: RE: News

RE: RE: RE: News

I agree with you on this one Twane.  I thought the exact same thing when I read it.  Either they were forced out or fundementally disagreed with what the company is doing. Either way its not good. 

 

Neither one of them had any skin in the game, just a handful of options that were given to them as BOD members.

 

I have no patience for delays in reporting.  I find it unacceptable, and the excuse given here is pure BS.  No matter whats going on behind the scenes, these 2 could have remained on the BOD for 2 more weeks to allow the reporting to take place on time.

 

 

Bullboard Posts