Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Sabre Gold Mines Corp T.SGLD

Alternate Symbol(s):  SGLDF

Sabre Gold Mines Corp. is a Canada-based gold producer in North America. The principal business activities of the Company are focused on exploring and developing the Copperstone Mine (Copperstone) in La Paz County, Arizona, United States. The Company has a 100% leasehold interest in the exploration and development stage Copperstone Project, which encompasses approximately 12,258 acres of surface area and mineral rights in La Paz County, Arizona, within a 50 square kilometer land package. It controls over 546 federal unpatented mining claims and two Arizona state mineral leases which together comprise the Copperstone Project area. The federal claims cover approximately 10,920 acres. It also holds other investments and projects at various stages of development.


TSX:SGLD - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by netwide2on Apr 27, 2013 12:44pm
114 Views
Post# 21309764

RE: Class Action - Wrte Todd and Erik .

RE: Class Action - Wrte Todd and Erik .

Get a life!  This is not about personalities, or lack of expertise.  It is about finding a reliable milling entity that will allow the mine to realize the full mine potential.  Or constructing their own milling capability.

Yes, I agree this problem should have been addressed last year when they forecast 2-4,000 odd ounces production, and entered into what at face to have been an unfortunate experiment at trucking ore some distance for milling.  I don't see that as one man's decision, or lack of experience.  It was done because there seemed no other alternative.  That is the point, IMO, that a decision should have been made to construct their own facilities.

Bullboard Posts