Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

VIRGINIA HILLS OIL CORP VFGGF

"Virginia Hills Oil Corp, formerly Pinecrest Energy Inc was incorporated under the ABCA on March 24, 2006 under the name Testudo Oil & Gas Exploration Ltd. The Company is a Calgary, Alberta-based oil and natural gas exploration, production and development company with operations in the Canadian provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan."


GREY:VFGGF - Post by User

Post by terroiron Apr 30, 2013 1:21pm
163 Views
Post# 21322325

Management Mistake

Management Mistake

Management made a mistake in not providing frequent updates on water-flood production. The success of the water-flood in rebuiling sustained production is vital to company success in dealing with the high decline rates in primary production. Yet, they have chosen to release data only coincident with quarterly updates.

This creates an uneven playing field, wherein those with access to field production data through the likes of GeoScout can see the effect of the water-flood earlier than other shareholders. Under normal circumstances this is less of an issue, and were it a new important well, the company would certainly be releasing updates ahead of the data becoming "public" through the paid services, or maintaining a confidential status.

In PRY's case each water-flood project is behaving like a new development well and all shareholders should be provided equal information through timely corporate releases ahead of the "public" data.

Terr

PS If anyone has access, feel free to share the latest prod rates in the water-flood projects.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>