RE: RE: RE: which "Puda Group is the "holding Company". But it is not a legal Entity. The owner of the Companies belonging to Puda Group (at least till 2012) is not an entity (legal) named Puda Group, it is MZ (IMO)."
I agree with that, until now the references to his overall holding has been referred to as the "Large Group" or sometimes Shanxi Puda Group and even Princeton.
I think things are changing in that regard and he is legalizing the overall holding company or at least he is using it as a trial balloon idea, probably searching for money and investors. The job website seem to indicate this...and more than that, it just makes sense. So I assume he is making the listing of the "Large" group a option as he throws everything against the wall to see what sticks.
But I don't see the large group hiring a chief engineeer as I said....so maybe it was just a mistake made by the job website yet the mistake tells us something we did not yet know perhaps......
In any case, I don't think it's relevant to our mess because I don't believe that any of these grandious plans of his will bear fruit before Puda Inc is revoked, so he has to work on that proplem prior to getting any of these potential ideas done and not contingent on some listing plan. The SEC will never buy into that.
In my view......
I suppose if this is something he is developing, we will get some sort of confirmation at some point in the near future, or it will just dry up and blow away.....