Deadline - we got it all WRONG! Looked at this again - May 16th was an "old" deadline, was it?
And we do have in fact official SECOND REQUISITION.
So new deadline will be based on Second requisition.....?
Unfortunately it can be logical. But G&W all along were insisting that the First one was perfectly valid....
So I guess the question is WILL THEY DEFEND THAT ORIGINAL May 16th deadline or just let it slip and go with new deadline based on Second requisition?
If it turned out to be the case , than I guess it would be a clear tactical WIN for Mr. McRae and his BoD.
G&W by their "de Facto acceptance" will "confirm" "validity" of deficiency statement from BNC.....
Oooooh Boy, wouldn't look good, this is all about reputation stupid.
LONG SUFFERING BNC REAL SHAREHOLDERS DESERVE BETTER THAN THIS SHOW..... FROM ALL SIDES INVOLVED.