Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Duluth Metals Ltd DULMF

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals


GREY:DULMF - Post by User

Duluth Metals Ltd > Hey Shootforthemoon
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by elberbankon May 28, 2013 10:53pm
174 Views
Post# 21453876

Hey Shootforthemoon

Hey Shootforthemoon

You said "The original mine structure/milling would have provided for a negative cash cost".......... and an other thing you said "..............Under this method, the cash cost wouldn't be negative, it would be around 10 cents."   is that good or bad?

Please explain.

<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities