cliffs lawyers I could be wrong on this, please correct me if i am wrong.
Cliffs lawyers last year when Kwg proposed this 50 to1 were there at the meeting in person
to enter their vote against it. WHY?
i would think that from history, consolidation is bad and that would eventually lower the value of the
company.
Why did cliffs vote against it if the end result would be picking up KWG on the cheap?