To the Board I appreciate and respect the nobility of management supporters here. You guys believe in Lori and current management and wish to protect that belief, that is your choice.
By attacking the opposite beliefs of yours and trying to discredit and attack the other side, you are making Lori and current management look bad. You are dipicting those you support as ruthless, vicious and many other things whereas you posters here are viewed as part of Lori,s movement to hold and retain her status. This reflection that you are presenting shines a negative light back on to management and only further succeeds in showing the rest of the public the nature of the beast,if you will.
By blatantly trying to discredit science and anyone that supports science and the facts, you are revealing your desperation that your intentions may not be honourable to this respect and are causing damage to those you wish to support. So in other words, you are hurting Lori by your actions, not helping her.Take some time and study the center of controversy and formulate your own opinion with the evidence you may find, by taking anothers word for it, you may not perceive all the elements or the full picture.
Lori has not lied about there being lots of gold on the Tesoro and her remarks of 1 million ounces in early days, and 5 million ounces a little later, are well supported by science, so by you guys coming on here and saying there is "no gold", please do a little research so that you are not mistaken and are supporting a notion that is evidently false, which in turn may others looking at you not so desirably. It is your choice how you wish to present yourselves here, but when you attack others and blatantly go against the evidence contradictory, it does not present a favourable picture on your part, and in turn this reflects back on those you support.
I suggest you review the findings and evidence and formulate your own opinions on what is happening, don,t take someone elses opinion for it. Or, as many shareholders have done, collect a file of the evidence from the property, take it to an individual geo or geophysicist to obtain their opinion to use in your evaluation if the facts seem correct or not. If you decide to do this, I would love to see the opinions you get from these geos posted on the board, this may help us all in getting the picture. Fighting and name calling is kinda childlish and unproductive, don,t you think?
Here is what one person said they heard at an Edmonton meeting in 2005 about the Tesoro, and a little bout the Carmi as well:
Their next property is in Peru. This is a grassroots play and will take time but is right dead on line and in between tow producing gold mines that have excellent grades coming out of them. There were some illegal miners on the property and have since been kicked off, but these guys were taking over $50,000/month off the property with nothing more than picks, shovels and wheel barrels. They would take the rock to the mine just north and get their money. They will be doing alot of work to this property this summer.
they also have a couple Moly porperties in BC. They have signed a JV with Hi Ho Silver(private firm turning public shortly) This company is well connected and are going to hit the property hard and want to prove it up ASAP. They are doing this and then going to sell it to a major inthe next couple years. This one should have alot of results coming out of it as there is alot of money going into it. St Elias had alot of calls on this property but said no to all until now as most of the Juniors just wanted to play the "hot metal of the Week", pump their stock and do no real work to the property. Hi Ho Silver has a game plan and could be very benificial to our company. The other Moly property is pretty close and could potentially dwarf this property but is still grassroots.
thank you, and peace to all
Love
rick