is my perception wrong? I see Primed claiming he has no shares, I see him claim one time this stock could be worth somewhere around $3000 per share, I see him claiming that there is very little on the Tesoro as drills have said.
If I am to be called a liar by believing old news releases, the geos that signed off on them, Quantec, professionals in the field, Lori in visual/audion interviews and meetings, then are you not indirectly calling all the above mentioned and perhaps more, liars as well? If you are, why such a interest here in protecting management? Do you not find this contradictory?
As for riskisrelative, I don,t believe you have the whole story yet and may I suggest that a face value perception of the situation, may suggest that more is happening than meets the eye on these boards? This thought may help you understand my actions a little better, and perhaps slightly change your point of view upon discovery. By calling me names, and a hypocrite as well, you may be missing the underlying intentions and merits and as a consequence,displaying a degree of ignorance and/or arrogance. I see this happen quite often where someone has little facts and jump to conclusions, I try to help when I can. My help to you may be, examine the facts a little more closely.
For those of you who brag you now have multiple times more stock because of the huge sp decline, why would you bother to buy stock in this company now, if you believed the properties are uneconomical? Why would you buy stock with a legal battle going on as well? If there is nothing here, how can you possibly gain by buying more stock?
My perception also is that shareholders votes/rights were tossed out the window as if they didn,t exist. Do you condone this type of action to peoples rights? Do you help fight for someone that does this to others? Do you not believe in rights? What exactly are you fighting for here, what is your cause?
I offer you a choice, to examine your choices and the merits they are founded upon.
I apologize to any shareholder that I may have banned from Agoracom that indeed have honourable intentions of supporting their investment. Decisions have to be made sometimes for the greater good of many, and unfortunately, sometimes there are victims of consequence. You must understand that SLI shareholders were fighting against incredible odds and there have been numerous attempts at destroying the strength and unity of such over the years. Its mainly because a group of shareholders this strong is considered a great that by some. SLI shareholders are well aware of tactics and antics used in a fight as such, and only in self defence do we mostly act, and not all the time upon provocation. At times of security question, the odd individual may have got wrongly dismissed, we apologize for this and do occasionally offer a chance of redemption by the dismissed, but when their demeanor stays the same, a conclusion is usually made that their intentions may not be honourable and that they are part of a force to disrupt. We have come a long way, mistakes have been made in the past, but they should be considered part of a learning curve and growth, and from mistakes, lessons are learned. Must you decide to constantly judge, then perhaps you will attract what you display?
For your own benefit, and again as a gesture of good will, will you please step back and look at what gains you may be getting from discrediting someone. The constant disection of my posts to try to discredit me, involves such pathetic behaviour and should instill a degree of embarrassment when they realize just how pathetic this is. For some to openly deny facts suggests a degree of high desperation and unlogical thinking, which in turn will not allow a realization of truth. Now you may wish to try to turn this around on me, its your choice, but remember not only to look at face value facts, there are usually hard facts, and sometimes illusion prevents one from enjoying the hard facts.
I don,t mean to judge any of you here, I love and understand you guys, and only wish to help.
Love All
Rick