Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Aurcana Silver Corp V.AUN.H

Aurcana Silver Corporation is a Canada-based company, which is engaged in the exploration, development, and operation of natural resource properties. The Company’s development properties are the Revenue-Virginius mine (the Revenue-Virginius mine or Ouray), located in Ouray Colorado and held through the Company’s 100% owned United States subsidiary, Ouray Silver Mines, Inc. (OSMI) and the Shafter silver property (the Shafter Silver Project or Shafter), located in Presidio County, Texas and held Aurcana Silver Corporation. The Revenue-Virginius mine is located in southwestern Colorado about 5.5 miles southwest of the town of Ouray. Access to the mine site is via County Road 361. The Shafter Silver Project, which is 375 miles southeast of El Paso, in Presidio County, southwest Texas, within a historic mining district.


TSXV:AUN.H - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by teddybear1111on Jun 10, 2013 12:19pm
160 Views
Post# 21506929

RE: RE: Some thoughts :):)

RE: RE: Some thoughts :):)

 

Scaldy, I did not write this quote but hopefully you may see the difference between Economics - as an ART form; and not as an established Science. Do you even comprehend the difference between Interpretation and Predictability?

( emphasis mine ) …”I think Anon has it exactly right. These points have not been addressed by anything Adam or Tyler Cohen has said. There is not in fact agreement on models in economics in the same way there is agreement in physics, or engineering, or chemistry. In those physical sciences, whether theoretical or applied, there is agreement not just on the basic variables in the model, but on the numerical coefficients that allow derivation (prediction) of the dependent variable. And there is agreement because there is reliable prediction, with many significant digits of accuracy. And the coefficients don’t change.

In economics, there is not reliable prediction, despite protestations to the contrary. There is not a single economic model with a coefficient that has the status of a constant and can be used to make point predictions. Not one, anywhere. This is not to say that you can’t make decent predictions about matters that involve money or the exchange and production of goods. You can. But you get that from common sense too, and while you can sometimes, for a while, get better predictions from replacing common sense with models, we never identify a model that actually has well-confirmed numerical precision. You might get one significant digit of accuracy, but again, only as long as things continue as they had recently. Then social shifts occur, and the coefficients, as measured statistically, change….” ( JD Halvorson )

 

My references, to other successful Models of Investment, were examples – NOT recommendations! Everyone chooses what they are good at. My thought was that we shouldn’t disparage someone because they use a different method (for success) than we would! (THAT was : " the Lesson! ")

Are you really that vain; or were you just rhetorically thumping your own shallow drum (again)??

Bullboard Posts