Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

KWG Resources Inc C.CACR

Alternate Symbol(s):  KWGBF | C.CACR.A

KWG Resources Inc. is a Canada-based exploration stage company. It is focused on acquisition of interests in, and the exploration, evaluation and development of deposits of minerals including chromite, base metals and strategic minerals. It is the owner of 100% of the Black Horse chromite project. It also holds other area interests, including a 100% interest in the Hornby claims, a 15% vested interest in the McFaulds copper/zinc project and a vested 30% interest in the Big Daddy chromite project. It has also acquired intellectual property interests, including a method for the direct reduction of chromite to metalized iron and chrome using natural gas. It also owns 100% of Canada Chrome Corporation, a business of KWG Resources Inc., (the Subsidiary), which staked mining claims between Aroland, Ontario (near Nakina) and the Ring of Fire. The Subsidiary has identified deposits of aggregate along the route and made an application for approximately 32 aggregate extraction permits.


CSE:CACR - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by razmot10on Jun 10, 2013 8:04pm
85 Views
Post# 21508588

RE: Oreleese

RE: Oreleese

Profit79,

I will try to explain my understanding of this EA vs Easement issue you've been bringing up based on my experience as a large project manager...

In simple word: 1) Commissioner can and will render it's decsion (favorable or not) about the easement which will then 2) allow MNR to grant the easement when and only when all projects impacts have been documented, evaluated and mitigated.

It is impossible to complete an EA without knowing where, what type of infrastructure and traffic your comtemplating. Hence an EA for a railroad  would be very diffferent than an EA for a road.

So first the Commisioner render its decision. Second either Cliff or KWG does their EA which is then approved by MoE and then if thendecsion was favorable to Cliff, which I doubt! the MNR grants the easement.

 

Bullboard Posts