Attack the messenger! Rather than provide a balanced, logical argument why Walker is wrong Glenthorne has resorted to attempting to diminish and marginalize. This is not surprising. He also conveniently avoided any attempt to explain why he falsely claimed the nickel financing was sold out when in fact it wasn't.
These are the same techniques used by the con man against any investor or other stockbroker who dared to ask questions about where the money was going.
A good example is the C**C broker who had been a very strong supporter from Empower's inception in 2000. When she began demanding answers she was suddenly isolated and marginalized. The con man began referring to her as being "crazy" and suggested she would be sued for selling off her clients EPT stock because, "Pauls about to sign a contract." Well, here we are 7 years later and her clients made a very tidy profit selling off EPT when they did because they took her advise. I doubt she has been sued, in fact I think its more likely she is receiving Christmas gifts from those grateful clients. The other C**C brokers also sold off as much as they could get rid of as well as brokers that worked for the same brokerage house as the con man. These honest, prudent brokers realized what was going on. Everyone of them washed their hands of Empower except the broker who it was rumoured held millions of EPT shares. Thats called a conflict of interest. The law requires that a stock broker always put their clients interest ahead of their own. With this guy it was the exact opposite and the results were massive financial loses for his clients.
As for an RCMP-IMET investigation I am not suggesting anyone initiate an investigation at this time. There is no statute of limitations for fraud in Canada and trading records are held in perpetuity. Personally, if Leung ever pulls this off and gets our money back I am going to make every effort to forget this entire nightmare including the con man.
In the meantime, for those who are interested here is a little bit of homework for you. Do a Google search using the words, "one party consent Canada."