Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Barkerville Gold Mns Ltd BGMZF

Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd is a Canada based company operates in the business of Gold. It is engaged in the production and sale of gold, and the exploration, development, and acquisition of mineral properties in British Columbia. The mineral tenures cover approximately 2,000 square kilometres. The company primarily holds interests in Cariboo Gold Belt District, Island Mountain, Cow Mountain and Barkerville Mountain.


OTCQX:BGMZF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by GoldExecuteon Jun 19, 2013 8:35pm
92 Views
Post# 21544831

RE: RE: RE: RE: So easy that...

RE: RE: RE: RE: So easy that...

Bigbab, Very true that I was expecting a lower total.  ONE caveat on that.  My prediction was based on using only the data the PG had in his appendix.  As I understand this, a bunch of additional drill holes were added to the calculation.  I stated this over and over.  My estimate was only based on the data contained in PG's report.  

I also don't think the report was "highly Scrutinized".  I think it probably had much more attention due to the issues that the first report had, but I think the majority of what probably held this up had to do with verbiage and the GP number.  Also, the report probably wasn't cleared for SEDAR until certain comments were addressed that would have only happened behind the scenes if BGM wasn't CTO'd.  I think every comment had to be addressed... 

Bullboard Posts