RE: RE: RE: Part 2 conversation with frank Mailman, are you seriously saying that the QP was forced by the BCSC to put all the pre 2009 drill holes in the inf. category? Snowden states multiple times that there are QA/QC issues with pre 2009 drill data. This includes no QA/QC, Assay questions etc. Maybe you do not understand the purpose of a 43-101. It is in place to set guidelines in which to calculate a viable resource. It is not designed for the company to state un-reliable resource numbers.
If and when a suitor comes to look at this project and they review the report, assays, QA/QC protocol, database management, Custody of samples, handling procedures, etc., it needs to be reliable. Call Mr. Jones and ask him if he would really do a resource calc with drill hole data that was not processed to CIM standards and use that data to calculate indicated ounces...
IT isn't the BCSC, again, it isn't the BCSC! The QP better follow standards or he and or firm will be either the laughing stock of the industry, or have Creds removed. Do tell me how it is the BCSC that did this!