PLS, PLN and bouldersFrom UIN interview with Ted O'Connor, CEO of Azincourt, Fission's PLN partner:
Q: Patterson Lake South ... has been getting a lot of attention, and returning really impressive results. Are you finding any similarities on the Patterson Lake North property that compare to PLS?
Ted O'Connor: One main difference, I’ll point out the differences that we have zero to 500 meters of sandstone cover, expected on the project.
The edge of the Basin is essentially right at the edge of our project so we won’t be finding any basement uranium mineralized boulders, like on Patterson Lake South. The reason for that is because it’s covered by sandstone and the ice direction is from the northeast. So, the only boulders on the project pretty much are sandstone boulders. So, there’s not chance of finding boulders. But, the ingredients for these uncomforming uranium deposits, like they found at Patterson Lake South, are all there.
There’s good structure, conductive basement rocks, altered sandstone with good clay mineralogy and trace element geochemistry. There’s what we call “pathfinder” elements enriched in the sandstone around uranium deposits. Well, we have exactly that situation at PLN, in from some of the historical draw holes. Certainly there’s in all those uranium, vanadium, cobalt, nickel, lead, I’m probably forgetting one, but anyway, the criteria that we look for to targeting, to narrowing down that targets on these unconforming uranium deposits, are all there at PLN.
Link: https://uraniuminvestingnews.com/14871/azincourt-resource-a-management-team-built-on-experience.html