RE:Disappointing 2nd end points met/ BeardownAz any thoughts?I just replied to Trussell's recent post with my more elaborate opinion on the matter. Not as bad news as it could have been. Still disappointing. A p-value of 0.08 is so darn close to 0.05. I think that if they go a p-value of under 0.05 with the 0.4 change in PAV, it would be a completely opposite spin. When you read my other post, please pay attention to my point about still not knowing how the RVX-208 treated group compares to the placebo group.