RE:Ad hominem attacks are for people who have a case that is weak.Ad hominem definition -see- Matthew Lewis of LBS Strategy Inc.'s favourite tactic - Observe Matt in action:
"Is it getting smelly in that outhouse hole you're digging in Creemore? You should have listened to your dad and stayed in school.."
"Your genius is only self-evident, troll."
"I think Shatner is on the crack pipe again. As stated, I don't know enough about the other company to comment on it.-----------------------Jim"
"Sell the stack of X-rated magazines your dad left you as an inheritance and join the bet, bignothing. Or are they in such bad condition between your tears and working out your right arm that they aren't even worth taking to the dump?---------------Jim"
"Our shorter friends are up absolutely bupkus until they buy back - and the lack of volume today (preceded by their grand gesture yesterday) shows they can't. As such, our drunken uncle seems a little agitated today. I think a shot of Demerol might help............Cheers.-----------------Jim"
"What an idiot.--------------Jim"
"I can also tell anyone who asks, that I know with "100% certainly" that Uncle Oats is an idiot.--------------Jim"
"The guy does zero DD, shows zero DD and disregards every post that goes up giving evidence of his dumbness. My golden retriever could outhink the old hillbilly.------------Jim"
Matt - really. You are the only one that believes you. Seriously... The only reason I couldn't put 20 pages of your unprofessional, nasty, derogatory commentary from you together is that this new Stockhouse is harder to navigate and it's just not worth it. Suffice it to say you haven't brought up ad hominem for quite some time and in fact you bringing it up is a form of ad hominem. Answer to the FACTS that have been presented about your professional endeavours. Is your father on the BODs of the companies mentioned and are you pumping these companies under a pseudonym for profit? Or would you rather make an "argument based on the failings of an adversary rather than on the merits of the case" ?