OTCQX:BGMZF - Post by User
Comment by
GoldExecuteon Aug 06, 2013 10:01am
59 Views
Post# 21651369
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Reality of a deposit like this
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Reality of a deposit like thisRoller, anyone who would claim to be an expert on a BB would be a true idiot. I would imagine that the majority of people within the industry would agree that the Krig method used releative to first creating a geologic model so that you have a much better understanding of the way in which the vein sets sit within a block is much more of value to getting a reliable resource then that of the method used. I would be willing to bet that even Snowden would agree. In fact, a comment was made in the report as to having a geologic model, but they didn't.
My comment purely reflects my belief that enough work has been done on this project historically to actually build a model. The underground workings have been mapped, analyzed, sampled, drilled, etc. Tons of surface mapping, drilling, soil geochem, trenching, etc have also been done.
It is my belief ( read opinion) that a decent geologic model would have helped enormously in helping better define the resource. It would (again in my opinion) aide in the future exploration of this project.
In my opinion, having cross sections plotted with the outline of the proposed pit, with historical workings within this project area would have much better demonstrated what is really happening on this.... As per what Frank promissed. He promised a report that would show all this.