Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Barkerville Gold Mns Ltd BGMZF

Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd is a Canada based company operates in the business of Gold. It is engaged in the production and sale of gold, and the exploration, development, and acquisition of mineral properties in British Columbia. The mineral tenures cover approximately 2,000 square kilometres. The company primarily holds interests in Cariboo Gold Belt District, Island Mountain, Cow Mountain and Barkerville Mountain.


OTCQX:BGMZF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by GoldExecuteon Aug 06, 2013 10:01am
59 Views
Post# 21651369

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Reality of a deposit like this

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Reality of a deposit like thisRoller, anyone who would claim to be an expert on a BB would be a true idiot.  I would imagine that the majority of people within the industry would agree that the Krig method used releative to first creating a geologic model so that you have a much better understanding of the way in which the vein sets sit within  a block is much more of value to getting a reliable resource then that of the method used.  I would be willing to bet that even Snowden would agree.  In fact, a comment was made in the report as to having a geologic model, but they didn't.

  My comment purely reflects my belief that enough work has been done on this project historically to actually build a model.  The underground workings have been mapped, analyzed, sampled, drilled, etc.  Tons of surface mapping, drilling, soil geochem, trenching, etc have also been done.

  It is my belief ( read opinion) that a decent geologic model would have helped enormously in helping better define the resource.  It would (again in my opinion) aide in the future exploration of this project.

In my opinion, having cross sections plotted with the outline of the proposed pit, with historical workings within this project area would have much better demonstrated what is really happening on this.... As per what Frank promissed.  He promised a report that would show all this.

  
Bullboard Posts