Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

HPQ Silicon Inc V.HPQ

Alternate Symbol(s):  HPQFF

HPQ Silicon Inc. (HPQ) is a Canada-based technology company specializing in green engineering of silica and silicon-based materials. The Company is engaged in developing, with the support of technology partners PyroGenesis Canada Inc. (PyroGenesis) and Novacium SAS, new green processes to make the critical materials needed to reach net zero emissions. Its activities are centered around the three pillars: becoming a green low-cost (Capex and Opex) manufacturer of Fumed Silica using the Fumed Silica Reactor, a proprietary technology owned by HPQ being developed for HPQ by PyroGenesis; becoming a producer of silicon-based anode materials for battery applications with the assistance of Novacium SAS, and Novacium SAS is engaged in developing a low carbon, chemical base on demand and high-pressure autonomous hydrogen production system. The Company operates in a single operating segment, segment, being the sector of the transformation of quartz into silicon materials and derivative products.


TSXV:HPQ - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Oro_Fanon Aug 09, 2013 8:51am
135 Views
Post# 21658813

RE:RE:RE:Thresholds

RE:RE:RE:Thresholds
Dear Schmid,

You comment : "I wasn't trying to bash, just to understand the relationship between the two companies." and other comments you have made the last few days are raising flags about the true goal of your posts.

I could be wrong but, your posts look like a poster trying to downplay UBR potential...

Why I have no clue....

Just look at your previous comment: "You unlocked the answer for me. They can only sell 10% or 500,000 shares basically, for 36 months, unless UBR's stake drops below 5% of CCB's fully diluted share count."

That comment was factually correct in December, but no longer applicable, since UBR stake did drop below 5%, and I had mention that in my post yesterday... The true relation is that there are no longer any relationships, with all that can imply...

Now why would an advanced member make such a deliberate omission ?

Second, Wednesday you made a big point to say that the up volume was meaningless while I pointed to the fact that the trading seem to indicate more an attempt by Scotia to shake the three..

When you look at yesterday trading, it does seem that Scotia is still trying to do that :

Trades for C:UBR on 20130808 - 11 trades displayed
Time ET Ex Price Change Volume Buyer Seller Markers
15:58:48 V 0.085 -0.015 500 7 TD Sec 85 Scotia K
15:56:31 A 0.09 -0.01 500 7 TD Sec 85 Scotia E
15:54:13 A 0.09 -0.01 500 7 TD Sec 85 Scotia E
14:54:38 V 0.09 -0.01 500 9 BMO Nesbitt 85 Scotia K
14:22:41 V 0.095 -0.005 250 19 Desjardins 36 Latimer
14:21:29 V 0.095 -0.005 250 19 Desjardins 36 Latimer
14:20:43 V 0.095 -0.005 250 19 Desjardins 36 Latimer
14:02:09 V 0.09 -0.01 1,000 9 BMO Nesbitt 85 Scotia K
13:57:10 V 0.09 -0.01 1,500 9 BMO Nesbitt 85 Scotia K
11:45:38 V 0.09 -0.01 1,000 7 TD Sec 85 Scotia K
11:42:14 V 0.095 -0.005 8,500 2 RBC 85 Scotia KL

What could be the reason for a 500 share down tick at the end ?

That raise no flags from you, but 4,000 shares purchases out of 26,000 midday does ?

So why do you focus so much on what you seem to call a pump operation and not place the same energy commenting a trash and cash plan ?

Asking the question does seem to give the answer....
Bullboard Posts