Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

SilverCrest Mines Inc SVLC



NYSEAM:SVLC - Post by User

Comment by shermandrockon Aug 16, 2013 12:29pm
231 Views
Post# 21676468

RE:Reason #2 seems the most plausible to explain the low gold production.

RE:Reason #2 seems the most plausible to explain the low gold production. Looking for Merrill Crowe technicians who may be able to 1) assess the assertion made by SVL and 2) assist us to understand exactly what occurs with the MC process. See below:


Insofar as the processes to accumulate the solution containing the disolved Au & Ag are reasonably similar, given that the Ag production was up 26% from Q1, it would seem reasonable to me that one could expect that the Au production would have a high degree of correlation.

Having said that, given that the situation has been "rectified" and, that management has maintained guidance, does that not imply a significantly increased Au production in Q3?

Any Merrill Crowe technicians out there who may shed some light on this?



<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>