Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Barkerville Gold Mns Ltd BGMZF

Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd is a Canada based company operates in the business of Gold. It is engaged in the production and sale of gold, and the exploration, development, and acquisition of mineral properties in British Columbia. The mineral tenures cover approximately 2,000 square kilometres. The company primarily holds interests in Cariboo Gold Belt District, Island Mountain, Cow Mountain and Barkerville Mountain.


OTCQX:BGMZF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by GoldExecuteon Aug 21, 2013 12:48pm
94 Views
Post# 21686756

RE:RE:Drill Hole & Assay

RE:RE:Drill Hole & AssayRoller... Thanks for the compliment on being amaturish.  Maybe my post is not as clear as it should be.  I am refering only to the 9 holes that BGM / Snowden twinned in the end of the year of 2012.  BGM stated in a PR that they would release the assay results as soon as available.  In addition, my comment refers to actually talking about the increase in gold from historical of these twinned holess.   I am purely stating that if you are going to discuss in a PR the increase of gold in these assays that you most likely have to actually provide the data that supports the claim.  

It is my belief and only my opinion that when you make statements like this in a PR, you need to provide the data that supports the claim.  I will do a little follow up on this very topic with several QP's as to my thoughts.  Even if not req'd, it would surely be much more trnsparent to actually provide the data as stated in the PR.
Bullboard Posts