GREY:ESOFD - Post by User
Comment by
Solveron Aug 30, 2013 11:11am
248 Views
Post# 21709343
RE:AMW Management
RE:AMW ManagementExcellendt post Losecash!! As long as Dev is associated with the project, I would be very uncomfortable with him in any kind of management position. It would be a definite no go for a merger in my opinion!!
The interview; remined me of another person I once seen: big red bulb nose, baggy pajamas with the spots, pointy hat with a pom pom and oversized shoes, phony smile.
No value for other projects that AMW has, ie Mikwam, Donna etc. seems to have been taken into consideration.
Right now, if you go to FCU's web sight and look at their projects page, only Beaver Creek has any analytical number values, and until the drills prove otherwise......they have a lot of the proverbial "moose pasture" some of it in a politically unstable country.
Take away PLS and look at both companies and you get a different picture altogether.
Obviously his 0.2% statement of ore values in the Athabaska shows he does not have a clue about ore values, and missed a chance by simply stating the truth that ave. ore values are 3%+, and 17-30% are commonly known. Had he given accurate info, both AMW and FCU would have benefited with added share value. As for the discovery of the boulder field, as I understand it, AMW did the groundwork and discovery.
This is probably a once in a lifetime investment opportunity with huge upside share values to come and I do not want someone who cannot take the time to be accurate and precise....in control of my investments.
Solver