Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Sandstorm Metals & Energy Ltd STTYF



GREY:STTYF - Post by User

Post by Melruneon Sep 03, 2013 9:55pm
565 Views
Post# 21716339

SND exchange a 13M$/year copper stream for a 2.4% NSR (1.8M$/year)???

SND exchange a 13M$/year copper stream for a 2.4% NSR (1.8M$/year)???
Hi all,

Just wanted to know if I'm doing the math correctly. 

SND stream if Donner would not have default:

12-14M$/year

SND NSR part: 2.4%.

According to the technical report, assuming total Glencore revenue at 496M$, that result into
around 11.9M$ for SND or about 1.8M$ cash flow per year.

How can this deal be good for SND?  It is clear that Glencore had the upper hand but to convert down the cash flow to about 1/10 of what was initially expected, I'm left wondering if I'm misunderstanding the whole thing.

I just don't understand why this deal is better than taking over the JV...    

The sister company Sandstorm gold had the money to chip in...  And SND could have return a large part of the cash flow to make it a deal that would have make sense for both SSL and SND shareholders.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>