Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Qsolar Ltd. QSLRF



GREY:QSLRF - Post by User

Comment by mercurysmithon Sep 04, 2013 12:53pm
153 Views
Post# 21717819

RE:continuing evolution of solar

RE:continuing evolution of solarThanks illumination.  One last insight.  It seems Q doesn't need much volume to do significant s/p increases--perhaps because so much of it is insider owned, there are not that many people selling shorter term.  

During the 7 months from October 2012 through April 2013 the s/p increased from .17 to 1.20 (a 7 bagger).  There were 144 trading days during those 7 months, yet only 18 of them had more than 100K shares traded (and most of them were barely over 100k).  Higher share volumes traded are possible with lower share prices ($1 buys 5 shares at .20 but only 1 share at $1.00).  

During those 7 months the $volume steadily increased.  There were 29 $volume days over $50k, but 29 is not too many given it was a 7 bagger durring that window of time. Then the EU dispute came--for example in the past 4 months (May - Aug 2013) there were only 8 trading days with more $volume than $50k, yet during those last 4 months the s/p dropped from $1.20 to .79.  In short,this is a two edged point--it doesn't seem to take too much volume to significantly change the s/p upwards or downwards.  Like I said earlier, I really do like this company, but it all depends upon how well they can now market their unique product in China and other non-EU locations such as the USA. 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>