Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Aquila Resources Inc T.AQA


Primary Symbol: AQARF

Aquila Resources Inc is in the business of exploring for and developing mineral properties. It operates in two geographical areas, the United States and Canada. It has three assets, the Back Forty Project located in Michigan's Upper Peninsula; Bend Project and Reef Project, are found along the mineral-rich Penokean Volcanic Belt. The area hosts multiple deposit types including VMS, magmatic copper-nickel and stratiform copper.


OTCQB:AQARF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by yoda2on Sep 17, 2013 9:40am
174 Views
Post# 21745129

RE:RE:RE:RE:a little bit of due dilligence

RE:RE:RE:RE:a little bit of due dilligence

Apple thank you for the info and the caution.
In follow-up I looked a little at AQA's web site and it seems to me (but I am not sure) that:

the back forty is locked into a separate company, BFJV?, and HBM owns 51% and AQA 49%,

HBM annouced it will not invest any more money in developing or exploring the project,

Of course it would seem HBM is still on the hook for the residual costs of holding the project and of the other commitments made to outsiders when the property was acquired, 


I do not know if AQA has to fund  its 49% share of these on-going residual  project costs ,

AQA's position seems limited either to find new financing (or a new partner)  to fund the project's development and exploration and/or to buy out HBM's 51% interest.

In summary it looks like AQA is stuck, with few alternatives to move the back forty project forward. 

I hope this info is helpful and I would appreciate further elaborations and clarifications (particularly in those areas where my impressions are incorrect.

 

 

Bullboard Posts