RE: ZEN ... UPDATE
Well, if the first article was so misleading, why is it still on the Streetsweeper website and why is Streetsweeper still standing by the relevations from the first part of the article?
Zenyatta threatened to defend from intentionally, misleading information, yet they didn't directly name Streetsweeper as the potential offender, and they haven't defended themselves legally.
ZEN did defend themselves with further promo material against the information contained in the article, yet they state investors should only rely on information posted on Sedar.
Quite interesting IMO. The Streetsweeper articile is still available to read for those seeking a different commentary than the usual promo type;
https://thestreetsweeper.org/