Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

RESERVOIR MINERALS INC V.RMC

"Reservoir Minerals Inc is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties in Serbia, Cameroon, Gabon, Macedonia and Romania."


TSXV:RMC - Post by User

Comment by cd673on Sep 24, 2013 9:58am
353 Views
Post# 21762672

RE:RE:Reducing the Rigs in nice weather aint a good sign.

RE:RE:Reducing the Rigs in nice weather aint a good sign.
Red, we know this important point 'mineralized footprint area of approximately 540 by 385 metres'.  So yes a couple of holes to the south were dry. So what?  The body is clear in the other directions.  I'm sure some smart people at RMC and Freeport have figured out roughly how big it is, and per the one local article posted, where they are probably talking to locals doing the work, it may be pretty big. What was that estimate again?  Does anyone else have sizing estimates at this point from their own models or the analysts covering this?  The more we know the better.

To me it is likely one drill is still turning because if no drills are turning that would mean Freeport could be accused of not working in good faith toward the BFS, and possibly put at risk their 20%.   Clearly they want to own 75%, and are staying in the BFS game, but also probably negotiating knowing more than we do at this point, per other credible posts on this board.  Not wanting to drive up the price of RMC further.  That is the most likely case I think.  But hey, who knows, it is definitely a gamble.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>