Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

A2ZCryptocap Inc T.AZC


Primary Symbol: V.AZC.P

A2ZCryptocap Inc. is a Canada-based capital pool company. The principal business of the Company is the identification and evaluation of assets or businesses with a view of completing a qualifying transaction. The Company has no significant assets other than cash and proposes to identify and evaluate potential acquisitions or businesses with a view to completing a qualifying transaction. The Company has not conducted commercial operations.


TSXV:AZC.P - Post by User

Post by deismanon Sep 26, 2013 1:58pm
224 Views
Post# 21770400

Shareholder Rights Plan

Shareholder Rights Plan
I just received notice of a special meeting to ratify a Shareholder rights plan for Augusta.  I looked it over and am a bit confused by the exercise price " each Right may be exercised to purchase one common share at an exercise price per Right of $15.00 "  My understanding of a "poison pill" is that it should give shareholderes a right to buy more shares at a discount.   $15.00 hardly seems like a discount.  Also a SRP is sometimes not a good thing as it gives directors the power to deter takeovers and puts directors in a position to enrich themselves, as they may effectively ask to be compensated for the price of consenting to a takeover.
I'm probably missing something.  Could someone who reads "lawyerspeak" review the circular and give the rest of us a simple explanation of this SRP?



<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>