RE:100% RMC claims in relation to known mineralization I remain positive also. RMC is well positioned. But it will probably be slow to develop. And as I have said before I'm not sure if big institutions will jump into a minority owner of a stake. It would be good to understand for comparables to RMC what sort of shareholders have been in the mix in the past.
One other thing that would be interesting to know is if the unreported holes Freeport drilled on 100% RMC land were on one or both of the parcels RMC is now doing survey work on themselves. I should probably look that upmyself, but if anyone knows please reply. Or are these new parcels that have not been drilled nor CSMAT work done. And why Freeport did those prior holes, were they based on prior CSMAT work? Does anyone know that?