Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Newcrest Mining Ltd NCMGF


Primary Symbol: A.NCM

Newcrest Mining Limited is an Australia-based mining company. The Company's principal activities are exploration, mine development, mine operations and the sale of gold and gold/copper concentrate. The Company owns and operates a portfolio of brownfields and greenfields exploration projects. The Company’s assets include Brucejack, Cadia, Havieron, Lihir, Red Chris, Telfer and Wafi-Golpu. The Brucejack asset is located approximately 950 kilometers (km) from Vancouver, Canada. The Cadia asset is located approximately 25 km from Orange, New South Wales (NSW). The Havieron asset is located approximately 45 km east of Telfer. The Lihir asset is located on the Niolam Island, approximately 900 km from Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea (PNG). The Red Chris asset is located approximately 1,700 km from Vancouver, Canada. The Telfer asset is located approximately 400 km from Port Hedland, WA. The Wafi-Golpu asset is located approximately 65 km from the city of Lae, PNG.


ASX:NCM - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by edxon Oct 22, 2013 11:05pm
393 Views
Post# 21839690

RE:Strathcona, Snowden dynamics, etc

RE:Strathcona, Snowden dynamics, etcDisagree. You are assuming Strathcona would risk their entire business credibility to temporarily hamper their competition until the "truth comes out". That does not add up at all.

Snowden will disagree with Strathcona, since it's their previously published resource estimate that stands to be extremely wrong and they won't be making many short lists to work on mining projects in the future if they are wrong.

Strathcona pulling out has put a huge stain on PVG and if Strathcona is wrong they won't be making many short lists to work on mining projects in the future. This is not a move that would have been done in haste and they must be pretty confident in their position to do this.

PVG of course will not agree that they don't have a mineral resource under any circumstances as the company ceases to have a reason to exist if they do.

The only party of the three that doesn't have a vested interest to protect with their stated position is Strathcona. Furthermore, Strathcona isn't just resigning and leaving, they are calling out PVG management and Snowden. This is a massive legal risk that they've taken on. The only legitimate explanation for that I can come up with, especially since they have no pre-existing interest here, is that they are distancing themselves from what they believe will be a fiasco. By publicly calling out PVG Management and Snowden they are protecting their future business interests, because to be associated or having facilitated the fiasco they think is coming would destroy their business credibility.

Here's how I think this ends:

- Strathcona is right - the resource is not economically feasible. I know they didn't explicitly say this, but that's how I interpret their statements that have been published.
- Snowden's resource estimate is not terribly far off. The minerals are there, but it's just not economically feasible to extract them on any kind of scale. They save face because their estimate was more or less accurate and they are committed to proving that by mining the entire bulk sample. Remember, it was never Snowden's responsibility to estimate economic feasibility, just size and grades. Mining the entire bulk sample will provide them their exit strategy.
- PVG suffers death by liquidity as they won't be able to raise another dime irrespesctive of if the deposit is economically feasible.
- PVG shareholders end up bagging groceries.

Red flags all over this one. Enter at your own risk.
Bullboard Posts