Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Santa Barbara Resources Ltd V.SBL

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals


TSXV:SBL - Post by User

Santa Barbara Resources Ltd > Barrick
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by tpaymanson Oct 24, 2013 7:17am
84 Views
Post# 21844171

RE:Barrick

RE:BarrickIf i am not wrong it could be 66% from 44% because 56% is Barrick deal.

That leaves Santa with only 15% or have I made a mistake somewhere?

Or is it 56% from 34% (because Rio's 66%)?

In both cases around16%
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities