OTCQX:BGMZF - Post by User
Comment by
yaponskion Nov 02, 2013 4:16pm
224 Views
Post# 21871246
RE:Another Miner
RE:Another Miner
dkolish01 wrote: A new environmental study into
Taseko Mines Ltd.’s (
TSX: T.TKO,
Stock Forum) billion-dollar New Prosperity mine proposal in British Columbia says it would pose ``several significant adverse environmental effects.”
Taseko's proposal received provincial approval in 2010. But the federal government rejected the original plan, which would have drained a lake of cultural significance to First Nations for use as a tailings pond. Taseko shares tumbled 9.8% to $2.31.
BGM is looking better and better as other projects close due to high cost and/or environmental concerns. Issues that BGM does not have.
kolish,
I fail to follow your login that BGM is looking better and better.
Cow Mountain is about 1/2 days canoe paddle upstream from New Prosperity. Any overflow from a Cow Mountain open pit is going to flow down stream to the New Prosperity area. So if New Prosperity is bad how can Cow Mountain be good given Cow Mountain is in the same rain forest and same water shed?
Do you just take a news headline, not consider what it means and then say this must be good for BGM since you want BGM to do well? You are looking like a pumpers pumper with this kind of logic...