Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Barkerville Gold Mns Ltd BGMZF

Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd is a Canada based company operates in the business of Gold. It is engaged in the production and sale of gold, and the exploration, development, and acquisition of mineral properties in British Columbia. The mineral tenures cover approximately 2,000 square kilometres. The company primarily holds interests in Cariboo Gold Belt District, Island Mountain, Cow Mountain and Barkerville Mountain.


OTCQX:BGMZF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by GoldExecuteon Nov 03, 2013 1:21am
251 Views
Post# 21871718

RE:RE:RE:HEY GOLD EXCUTE RE: TWIN DRILL HOLES

RE:RE:RE:HEY GOLD EXCUTE RE: TWIN DRILL HOLESBX, 
agreed that snowden reports in the 43-101 that they requested  9 drill holes and that these were drilled.  however, they only show the results from one hole on a graph.  Yes, they state that the "results indicated a general agreement in the location of mineralized areas".  however, a few paragraphs later they state that for a number of reasons "the direct assay value comparison between the drill holes is not an ideal methodology" and that "extreme differences in grade make meaningful comparison of pairwise statistics meaningless".  so basically they can demonstrate that there is gold in the same general area of the drill hole, but they can't do any better than that.  the actual results are not reported, and there is nothing at all to say that the results "match within 90%".  If you look at the plot (figure 37) you can see that things do not match within 90%, which would suggest that each sample down hole would be virtually the same as the adjacent one in the other hole.  instead, you can see a general correlation over the sampled interval.  this is the result of the presence of extremely nuggety gold and other factors mentioned in the report.  the report does state that the correlation is "adequate" to validate some of the old data, but can't do much better than that.

I am not an expert in HARD plots, but what I do get from the data provided is that trying to get a predictable model is very hard to achieve.  This does not reflect on the report, it only reflect on the nature of the beast... The beast being Nuggety gold projects.


Bullboard Posts