OTCQX:BGMZF - Post by User
Comment by
GoldExecuteon Nov 04, 2013 10:40am
265 Views
Post# 21873861
RE:?'s for GoldE, Twin holes-Acid Rock (not Jimi Hendrix type)
RE:?'s for GoldE, Twin holes-Acid Rock (not Jimi Hendrix type)BX, was glad to see the assay data for the D.H., obviously some nice intercepts, but what would be of value would be a comparison table of the holes they twined (original hole Vs. new Twin). I have many other comments, but don’t want to upset the natives thinking I am bashing…. The comments are not so much as negative, just things that I know people (analyst for instance) would ask or look at. I will send you a priv. message as to that if you would like.
With regards to the PAG, I don’t think anyone is trying to take a shortcut, I don’t think it is a rookie question, and way more is being made out of it then should be. They were just seeing if others had methods to determine PAG besides visual inspection…. The issue especially for a smaller mine is dealing with it when you have limited real estate to store this at. Very large mine sites quite often don’t even test it (on a defined scale, they will know from earlier drilling when they will be getting into a PAG zone)…. They will dump a bunch of clay type waste material on the waste dump area, then load the PAG rock, then cap it with more clay type waste. Obviously, the longer you work a mine site, the easier it is to plan and deal with this material. I honestly don’t think the question the Geo asked was take short cuts. I think it was to see what other groups are doing…