Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Queen's Road Capital Investment Ltd T.QRC

Alternate Symbol(s):  BRSGF

Queen's Road Capital Investment Ltd is a financier to the global resource sector. The Company is a resource-focused investment company, making investments in privately held and publicly traded resource companies. The Company acquires and hold securities for both long-term capital appreciation and short-term gains, with a focus on convertible debt securities and resource projects in development or production located in safe jurisdictions.


TSX:QRC - Post by User

Post by GeneralKesefon Nov 05, 2013 3:33pm
173 Views
Post# 21878489

LETS DO SOME COMPARISON

LETS DO SOME COMPARISON
For those not following – the comparison to Reservoir (RMC- TSX , $4.50)  is very appropriate. Reservoir was the darling of PDAC last year and one of few stories of higher grade porphyries. Beyond the similarity in terms of intercept and grade, the differences between the two of us plays in our favor.  Reservoir key discovery hole (266m @ 1.23% copper eq.) was in July 2012 and sent the stock on its way from change to multi-dollars -
 
If you look at their hole (~1700 meters in length):
 
1) they hit nothing until the ~600 meter mark which means they basically have ~600 meters of "overburden" (our mineralization – ie copper/gold starts within 20 meters of surface). That means they are 100% stuck into an underground mine whereas ours is likely to be open pit plus it also means we get a lot more in situ metal then them – ie larger resource)
 
2) they only hit mineralization until ~850 meter mark. The rest of the hole from 850 to 1700 meters is also barren (all our holes remain in mineralization to the end of each hole and beyond). That means that they have little to no upside. Their deposit is a flat layer 250 meters thick. The question is how wide. For us, the question is not only how wide but more importantly how deep. So far we have identified a 900 meter thick layer that remains bottomless. One can imagine the upside there.
 
3) their grade distribution is 80/20 Cu/Au in terms of value whereas ours is 50/50 Cu/Au. What does this mean? Well that probably only base metal players will look at their deposit in terms of a takeover whereas we've got the door open to precious metals players as well. Now the market favors copper over gold this year but if gold rallies, watch out as we have a gold deposit with a copper by-product rather than the other way around should gold prices rally.
 
All-in-all, I would say:
> grades are similar at similar depth (1% Cueq at 500-800 meter depth)
> BG has economic/copper gold between the high grade layer and surface (they do not)
> BG hasn't delineated the bottom of that layer  (they not only have determined the bottom of the layer  but also the bottom of the deposit)
= BG has upside ,i dont think they do!

do your own research

general kesef

Bullboard Posts