Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Puda Coal Inc PUDA

Puda Coal, Inc. (Puda) is a supplier of high-grade metallurgical coking coal to the industrial sector in the People’s Republic of China (the PRC or China). Its processed coking coal is primarily purchased by coke and steel producers for the purpose of making the coke required for the steel manufacturing process. Puda’s operations are conducted by Shanxi Puda Coal Group Co., Ltd (Shanxi Coal), which it controls through 90% indirect equity ownership. Puda cleans raw coking coal sourced from third-party coal mines primarily located in Liulin County, Shanxi Province, and markets the cleaned, coking coal to coke and steel makers. Its primary geographic markets include Shanxi Province, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hebei Province, Beijing and Tianjin, China. It purchases raw coal from a diversified pool of local coal mines in Shanxi Province.


GREY:PUDA - Post by User

Post by coldheaton Nov 06, 2013 1:15am
197 Views
Post# 21879781

A couple things on the Puda Coal Class action

A couple things on the Puda Coal Class actionThe first is that the plaintiff group wanting to replace the lead plaintiffs and legal counsel for legal reasons recently had their nearly 6 month effort denied by the judge.
As a result they are appealing.
"Full docket text for document 272:
NOTICE OF APPEAL from [263] Memorandum & Opinion,,,,,,,,. Document filed by Hotel Ventures, Howard Pritchard, Salomon Querub, Thomas Rosenberger, Steven Weissmann. Filing fee $ 455.00, receipt number 0208-9018770. Form C and Form D are due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A)(Rosen, Laurence)

I am not a lawyer, but this seems a waste of time..(which may be the purpose of it)..the primary case is scheduled for trial in march 2014, but these things never make it or rarely make it to trial.

Nobody wants that expense and now the second part of my news is that the Moore Stephens Hong Kong defendants have just asked the judge for a schedule change that will allow them a opportunity to recieve a summary judgement.
That means they can't agree to settle and want to plead their case and take what comes from the judge.

Not sure what they are up to here..(could be delay of game) Or they may just want out and want a judgement..I will keep you posted..this is not the first defendant to do this..

I should have more on this later.
I don't understand why they cannot arbitrate a settlement all together....something just seems off here.

Keep ya posted....
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>