Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Alpha Minerals Inc ESOFD



GREY:ESOFD - Post by User

Post by battlereadyon Nov 15, 2013 4:45pm
325 Views
Post# 21911518

Wrongful Interference

Wrongful Interference I wonder if the counterclaim refers to the following. Below is a small part of a press release from Lakeland Resources  2013/06/05

"Termination of non-binding letter of intent with 877384 Alberta Ltd.

Lakeland also announces that the company is not proceeding with the letter of intent dated Feb. 26, 2013, and announced on March 1, 2013, with 877384 Alberta for the exclusive rights to acquire eight uranium properties located within the Athabasca basin. Management had reached a consensus with respect to the terms of a definitive agreement, but was not able to accept the risk associated with a third party claim against the properties."

877384 is being sued FCU. I would like to hear AMW's comments before I vote.  

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>