RE:RE:RE:4215 ounces from 8,090 tonnes..nice
what is the significance of the wet/dry distinction? Is it related to the prior announcement of additional processing due to the grav/flot process having a lower yield than expected? If so, then it may be the case that all of the sample has been through 'primary' processing and what remains is the detritus that requires secondary processing. I think they had said that this boosted yield from the 80s to the 90s, which would suggest another 400 oz or so. I know nothing about the gold mining industry, so if I'm misreading the PRs then my apologies.