RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Logmein response to 01 appeal brief to CAFC...having just read the LOGM reponse, which I must say was very thorough and well documented, 01 was 'knocked out with a vicious left hook' in the 1st round. Dr Bhatta... outflanked 01's Dr's Ganger n Grisham in regards to terminology, especially with regard to source code. The arguments by LOGM with regards to how 01's lawyers did NOT seem to object to certain information certainly will not hold us in high esteem to the DC. Obviously, LOGM's approach is to weigh everything to their side, which their their high-priced lawyers accomplished better than 01's, which they did and how!
...the bottom line, imo, is that B&H were poorly prepared for this event and were made to run home wagging their tails between their legs. For all the time that was used from the time this case started, one would think that their 'team' would have expected the unexpected. I wonder if they knew about AC's statement's to the CRA regarding the 'multiple locations problems...'? Anyways, kiss this good-bye, and let's hope that they don't friking blow-up our case with CTXS the way they did with LOGM.
...have a gd 01
...g-g