Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Canada Carbon Inc V.CCB

Alternate Symbol(s):  BRUZF

Canada Carbon Inc. is a Canada-based junior natural resource company focused on the acquisition and exploration of natural resource properties. It holds a 100% interest in two graphite properties located in Quebec: The Miller Graphite Project and Asbury Graphite Project. The Miller Graphite Property is located in Grenville Sur la Rouge, Quebec. The Miller hydrothermal lump-vein historical graphite mine and surrounding property cover approximately 100 square kilometers (km2) and is located 80 kilometers (km) west of Montreal in the Grenville Township. The Asbury Graphite Project is made up of two claims for a total of 119 hectares (ha). It is located 8.1km northeast of Notre-Dame-Du-Laus in the Laurentides Region of southern Quebec.


TSXV:CCB - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by chubster56on Nov 28, 2013 9:38am
182 Views
Post# 21949412

RE:RE:RE:Sorry birch

RE:RE:RE:Sorry birchOnce again my opinion is  Bob the knob/Nutcap52 have nothing whatsoever to do with real CCb management Ceo or otherwise. The lawsuit aspect is a fabrication promoted by them and not the real CCB. It was done by them in my opinion to knock down the share price and boy did it work. Still I have no idea how one could actually quantify the damage done in real dollar terms Remember to sue for damages you have to establish losses caused by them or anybody else in real dolllar terms. Pretty tough to do when the smart money got out. If proven the real CEO was posting big losses piled up by shareholders could be grounds for damages but we all now its a fantasy the real CEO was posting
Bullboard Posts