RE:RE:RE:RE:Re: drill results"The Cleo vein is an interesting anomaly, but it is the possible grade of the bulk tonnage that is making me interested in this."
Agreed, paths....In fact, I'm still not sure if Cleo was a fortunate or an unfortunate accident! I suppose you'd have to say fortunate in the end, considering what it tells us may be lurking underground elsewhere on the property, but it certainly has muddied the waters turning up when it did.
From what I can tell as a layman reading your obviously well-informed posts, you are basically in agreement with Snowden's strategy and methods, are you not?
Also, when you say that Cleo is "an interesting anomaly" and there is "no confirmation that additional veins are present", are you inferring that it will likely be treated as an outlier in the revised resource estimate? (I mean outlier in the sense that there may not be enough data points elsewhere on the property to incorporate it at all with a sufficient degree of confidence.) That certainly seems to be the conclusion of a lot of educated observers, but it seems to me there must be a way to estimate the likelihood of Cleo being replicated elsewhere throughout Brucejack (and how often) based on similar historical deposits, at least within a reasonable range of probability.
Or is it Brucejack itself that is the real historical "outlier"?