Barkerville Gold Mns Ltd BGMZF

RE:[Its a good day...]

[GoldExecute]

Just to be clear, I think many here might be under the impression that a reject means that it was something that was not previously assayed.  THE REJECT is actually the part that was saved to the side from the material previously sent in and crushed( ½ of the core is cut and bagged), a portion of which was sent to make a pulp and the other portion is now what is called the reject (they should also still have the other ½ the core that is saved and stored in the core shed).  It isn’t that they are assaying a new interval. The gold in this hole (Boss is referring to 11-25B) actually showed gold…  In fact, in the press release dated June 27, 2011 it reported the following for this hole:
CM11-25B (June 2011)

• 19.9 m (65.4 feet) of 83 g/T (2.429 oz/) gold between 102.7 m (337.0 feet) and 122.6 m (402.4 feet)
  • including 10 m (32.9 feet) of 165 g/T (4.824 oz/t) gold between 107.3 m (352.1 feet) and 117.3 m (385.0 feet)
  • including 1.9 m (6.3 feet) of 821 g/T (23.943 oz/t) between 114.3 m (375.0 feet) and 116.2 m (381.3 feet)

And the same hole from Dec 16, 2013
CM11-25B (Dec 2013)

• 17.5 meters (57.4 feet) of 104.8 g/T (3.057 oz/t) gold between 105.2 and 122.7 meters (345.0 and 402.4 feet)
  • including 6.4 meters (21.0 feet) of 280.5 g/T (8.181 oz/t) gold between 114.3 and 120.7 meters (375.0 and 396.0 feet)

  Quite nice results, but the company failed to explain how they composited the material.  Having the information would help the reader understand what really is going on in the assay mentioned.
 
Also of huge note, in the 2011, they actually put some dimensions on the vein being discussed.  See the press release.