Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
News Focus
Voyageur Signs Letter of Intent with Large Multinational Pharmaceutical Company (click to learn more)
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Barkerville Gold Mns Ltd BGMZF

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals
Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd is a Canada based company operates in the business of Gold. It is engaged in the production and sale of gold, and the exploration, development, and acquisition of mineral properties in British Columbia. The mineral tenures cover approximately 2,000 square kilometres. The company primarily holds interests in Cariboo Gold Belt District, Island Mountain, Cow Mountain and Barkerville Mountain.


OTCQX:BGMZF - Post by User

Barkerville Gold Mns Ltd
Bullboard Posts
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by yaponskion Dec 16, 2013 6:10pm
127 Views
Post# 22011567

RE:RE:[Its a good day...]

RE:RE:[Its a good day...]

 It isn’t that they are assaying a new interval. 


Shouldn't  the press release have been write to show the original assay results versus  the results from the REJECT?  That would actually be interesting IMO, especailly if there was some discussion of the variance between original and 2nd assay results. And it would be crystal clear to any reader that this was NOT a new interval -- rather it is completion of normal work started back in June 2011.  That is quite a long delay in completion wouldn't you say?

Also what were the QA steps taken to validate the work?
Bullboard Posts
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities