RE:Re:InconsistenciesSorry, hndh42hnt, your logic escapes me completely. If the plant is designed for 2,900 t/d and you run it on 79% of the design or 104 t/h, why do you design that plant for a higher throughput and spend all that extra capital? Furthermore with this lower feed the metallurgical performance deteriorates. Of course, in incidental cases this lower feed rate could happen, however it will be bad practice to prolong this situation. Tonnage should be as close as possible to the design to get optimum performance, variations will be harmful. You are correct, financing is a problem, which would not be helped by issuing sloppy reports. Equipment on site follows financing. I have been involved in many feasibility studies, but your logic of tonnage throughput I have never encountered. Personally I would be ashamed if I had any dealings with this report due to the inconsistencies.