Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Coniagas Battery Metals Inc. T.COS


Primary Symbol: V.COS Alternate Symbol(s):  CNBMF

Coniagas Battery Metals Inc. is a Canada-based exploration and mining company. The Company is focused on nickel, copper, and cobalt in northern Quebec. It is advancing Graal Nickel & Copper Project. The Graal Nickel & Copper Project (the Property) is located in the north of Saguenay Lac St-Jean region. It is comprised of 110 map-designed claims covering 6,113 hectares. The Property is also located at 190 kilometers (km) north from the seaport terminal of Grande-Anse (Saguenay).


TSXV:COS - Post by User

Comment by vermadaon Jan 20, 2014 4:56pm
234 Views
Post# 22112926

RE:Governance

RE:Governance"promote initiatives that should improve reliability of production, reduce operating costs and optimize capital expenditures"  Did or could the board member provide any specifics?  If there are no specifics of value, then the staff and board do nothing more than the person at a bank trust department dealing with the cash flows of an energy trust. And then their compensation has nothing to do with other oil and gas companies.   ……………………………………….                               
If we put NAMSOC in charge of finances, got rid of the board and the PR department, and hired a bank trust department to deal with the mechanics of the cash flow, would we be better off? …………………………………………
If we made compensation depend only on  the stock performance relative to other oil sands companies, would we be better off?.............................................................................................................................................................
 
If SU or IMO bought out COS, would they have effective control?  And would Syncrude do better? Why not turn Syncrude into a listed corporation, and give us the shares as well as the other holders. …………………………………………………………….
 
Are we being overly optimistic about COS?  I hope not.   But most comments on this site have an optimistic  bias.  COS is going to 27……….  Articles predicting oil prices going up…………. Scenarios showing upside to SCO, although giving the reader room to create the downside. 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse