RE:RE:RE:Information SourceGuy,
Are you disagreeing with any of this the analysis below? The interlocking directorships are fairly easy to explain - a falling out of former associates - Baldock on one side, a shadowy group on the other - some of the wolves are on the MMY board; some of the sheep are on other boards. I don't know what qualifications the wolves have to run our company but I expect they are aware of the cash - everyone in mining needs it. As Romera says, "I'm holding my nose and voting for the man who created the cash - Baldock and the current board, wolves and all.
https://classicvalueinvestors.com/i/2012/10/letter-to-monument-mining-from-cedar-creek-partners/
Also note the Goldmet acquisition of a 26% interest in Monument earlier this year. The shares and warrants could only have been acquired from Orifer SA, a Swiss company controlled by Francois Marland, a known associate of Robert Baldock, Monument’s President and CEO.
Goldmet is controlled by George Molyviatis, a former director of Monument and also an associate of Mr Baldock.
A present Monument director, Jean-Edgar de Trentinian, is a director and president of Orifer SA and therefore an associate of Messrs Baldock and Marland.
Goldmet and Tulum (that is Francois Marland) in concert will control 45.9% of Monument should the present proposed private placement to Tulum proceed.
In effect these parties in concert will control Monument and it also means that it will be almost impossible for a party of concerned shareholders to unseat the present board of directors. Such a party must have control of at least 30% of the issued capital before it can commence an action to unseat the board.