RE:RE:RE:Aren't they paid for articles?seanmac12 wrote: Talk about sensitivity. Well making a statement gets posters verbally attacked on this board. Looks like I know why the tiny trading.
Apparently I am sensitive to nonsense because something struck me as wrong about your post right off the bat. I decided to look into it rather than ignore you because I wanted to actually work out what my subconcious had perceived was wrong. It is always beneificial to me to sometimes doublecheck if my gut instinct is right or leading me astray.
I do realize that my first impression of some people might be wrong and I have learned that one way to get beyond the first impression is to engage them in debate or to clarify their viewpoint. In a debate, I attempt to point out logical inconsistencies in their position in the hope that they in turn can use a logical process to either correct their mistakes or prove me wrong. Of course, the real benefit to me is in following the logic in their response so that I can determine whether or not I waste time reading them in the future. I want to thank you for being concise.
If you read carefully, you will realize that I am actually trying to help you in the hopes that you are just misguided and not an actual troll for hire or pleasure. Do whatever you want with the lessons.
As an aside, the level of logic and emotional control used to determine that [NES trading volume is low because of something goindeeper said] indicates that stock trading may be an especially painful pastime for you.