Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Longview Oil Corp LGVWF



GREY:LGVWF - Post by User

Comment by konzelmannon Feb 13, 2014 11:10am
255 Views
Post# 22204799

RE:RE:Valuation

RE:RE:Valuation
Well, if you run the numbers, $80,000 per flowing barrel comes to: 6000*80,000 = 480,000,000 480,000,000 - 115,000,000 = 365,000,000 365,000,000 / 47,000,000 = $7.76 So that would be a way of fundamentally supporting why we would get over $7. Realistically we may not. But it's not difficult to support why we could. I'm thinking ~$6 just because even though the fundamentals support a higher price, there is a limit to the premium that someone will offer over where the shares have been trading. Even though I can support it being worth $7.76, all a buyer has to do is point to the way Longview has traded for the past year and tell me that obviously the market is the best judge of value (efficient market and all that) and that my fundamental analysis is obviously flawed. But there's your answer as to how to support the claim of $7+.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>