OTCQX:BGMZF - Post by User
Post by
GoldExecuteon Feb 13, 2014 12:57pm
204 Views
Post# 22205593
2011 to 2014 Assay
2011 to 2014 AssayI don't think I have ever seen a public company not discuss comparative results. What is the point of providing the most recent results without comparisons to the previous assays. How many of the longs here just think these press releases are amazing? I provided data on CM11-102... If nothing else, it would appear that truly the nuggety effect is demonstrated in this hole. Just look at the intercept from 2011 assay from 192.8 to 397.3 (204 feet supposedly at 14.2 grams). Now look at the results for same segment. Nothing reported from 192.8 - 225.3. Then the high grade segment (254 - 257) dropped very significantly.
What do you think happens to a model when you have 204.5 feet change to a total of 28.8 feet of mineralization?
Is this why they don't provide analysis of the 2 different assays?