RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Patterson Lake versus Forrest Lake It's hilarious how personally the posters on this board take any bit of criticism or dissent. Get some perspective guys. (BTW, I get it, you guys have money in the game, or other interests.. you have an agenda, fair enough)
Obviously infill drilling has to be done, but I agree with Buxx, it is pretty boring. FCU has enough $.. they should be actively and agressively exploring the rest of the property, maybe some of the other 100 EM conductors on the property. Who knows, they could all be mineralized!!! (sarcasm).
Besides adding pounds to resource estimates they build the body of knowledge needed to keep exploratory drilling from being more than a random process.
Not saying there's not more to be learned, but surely at this point they have a pretty good idea of what's going on. We're 100+ holes in..surely the award winning team with their many years experience should be able to come up with some drill targets that aren't completely random!!!!! And if they can't, maybe they should give the Ainsworths a call?
Some questions
-Where is the blue sky?
-Do the other EM conductors have potential? If so, why aren't they being explored?
-Is the boulder-finding technology legit, or promotional technobabble?
-Has the rest of the property been flown with the boulder-finding technology?
-How good is radon? How many hot radon targets have been duds? Radon's being tossed around as this miracle exploration method, probably because we only hear about radon targets that hit, and not the ones that miss...
-When is the next AGM? Who's going to be on the board nomination list? Are the Alpha guys going to be purged? Will there be a competing board nominantion?
-Is the Dev/Dahrouge lawsuit going to be a distraction?
-How are Ross and the Team coping with the increased workload of operating the Brades and Azincourt programs?